Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
it's... not necessary. 🤷♂️
整体套路化，说教味太浓，呼吁性工作合法化真的大可不必，和妈妈一起看的感觉很奇妙
「享受身体是天赋人权」的主题很有意思，遗憾的是，落脚点又是正确但无聊的「家庭」，所以从本质上，这并不是一部勇敢的电影。
话痨/ 谁不希望在疲惫之年获得这样一份慰藉呢 坦诚是所有的答案
Tonight we honor what was lost.
原来对于性的拧巴不仅仅在东亚人身上，女性欲望和性愉悦的不被正视真是哪里都有
作者让一切简化，注意力全部让在两个人的关系上，即使是通过性爱这样看似非常私密的抵达方式，但两个人之间还是很敏感，不那么容易接近。某种程度上它映射了今天的人际关系、男女关系。
这种封闭空间全靠对话推进的少数人的舞台剧型电影，英国人玩的最溜。无论套用什么样的大环境和目的，还是需要靠人物关系推动剧情进展的。两代人观念的碰撞与和解，理解与自省才能达到有效交流。Emma Thompson真的是从年轻美到老，尤其第四段，我爱她布满皱纹的容颜和镜前的全裸
好精彩的剧作推进！看得我好几次热泪盈眶，到最后直接泪流不止。这样的剧作应该已在我的脑海里预演过千万遍，但这是第一次被做得如此系统与完整。这部性喜剧，相比起其他任何的性题材，显得那么的单纯与真诚。这不仅关于性，还关于人与人之间的交流、尊重、理解和文明。当Emma最后像是喊口号一样地说出“pleasure is a wonderful thing,it's something we should all have”时，我觉得感动得不得了。我们把羞耻建立在爱人对你的爱抚、亲吻与倾听之上，用罪恶去捆绑原始的欢愉。我觉得或许当有一天我们选择去原谅自己的原罪，那才是我向往的人类文明的彼端。
终其一生，我们都希望能遇到某个机缘打开灵魂深处的死结，完整地拥抱自己。
原以为还是老生常谈的话题，没想到戏剧张力十足，立意比同题材高很多，Emma Tompson给我太多惊叹，小鲜肉固然可口，学会自己满足自己才是王道。
再来补官摄，无论是立意词曲还是表演都是很完整的作品。突然想起本来2020是可以看到澳洲版卡司来上海演出的啊。。希望平行世界里已经看了。
戴上职业假面的男主，从审美学角度来说无懈可击。他能洞悉任何人的需求从而提供服务，甚至堪称心理咨询师持证上岗哈哈。在这场关系中，两人重组了“母子”也互为“救赎者”，完成了一场敢于直面对抗勇于接纳自己的疗愈。
一个禁忌的话题，两个善良敏感的人。女性困境（不止是老年）、成为母亲的羁绊、正在衰老的身体不断提醒着女主要在有限时间里遵从内心的活着。从下单性服务却拧巴退缩，Nancy与Leo诉说着彼此的经历，互相取笑对方糟糕的母子关系、以及那些人生中的期盼与遗憾，两个角色的关系一直不断的流动。影片最后，终于达到高潮的Nancy看着镜中已不再曼妙的身姿，终于放下了不安和拧巴，此时此刻她的眼睛里有光。
“你想看到一个broken whore吗？现在你看到了。 ”人类的本质是孤独，不管外在表现的多么优雅、克制，不管对方能给予多大的愉悦，内心最深处的裂痕终是需要自己去粉刷，然后和解。
3.0。看眼海報就能想出劇情的大致落點，全然屬於乘著女性主義浪潮的陳舊雞湯，並且沒有看出非要拿這個劇本拍電影而不是做成舞台劇的必要性。
脑子里思考了一下, 再组织一下语言. 这确实只是一个一般的片子, 败笔在于结尾两人快速转变, 并教育起"服务员"(观众)来. 落了下乘. 当然不是说不可以教育, 而是有更高明的手法, 以及前面对于最后的观点输出应该是层层铺垫递进的. 当转弯这么快时, 前面的故事性就不好评价了, 你说当我去欣赏故事的娱乐性时, 后面突然给我上课, 你说当我准备去接受你的思辨时, 那我是不是看看结尾就够了?
蛮好的 挺有意思的
在这个世界上，有很多上帝的化身在你生命中以不同的身份、形象突然出现，他会们用八万四千法门教会你如何爱和包容，然后微笑着离去，在天堂等你。
一个墨守陈规的宗教学教师在中年老年丧偶后开房叫鸭的故事，并在台词中探索了家庭、父母和孩子、长辈和孩子等各类社会关系，讲求人在某种层面上的自我解脱。境界不错，就是太戏剧化。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
