Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
3.5有时候会在争辩爱情和正常推进剧情之间显得失衡，加的波洛身世这段我觉得尚可，不懂那些用动物吓人的方式有什么意义，跟主线剧情无关。
我觉得肯尼斯拍这个系列更多是刻画人物群像，用更现代的视角解读经典，换句话说是重人物轻悬疑。
抄写都不及格，改编也不会！虽然故事还是那个故事，但导演为什么偏要去其精华！人物都没刻画好！影片中途一度睡过去了…
哪怕看过原作，看过老版，我也依旧会为这桩谋杀的精妙设计而感到讶然，然而影片里，这种“精妙的设计”被快餐式地飞速呈上，俨然丧失了其本身让人抚掌，恍然的原意。
⒈真的没想到，竟然在网络大电影中，发现这样一部情节紧凑，动作精彩，剧情还算说得过去的电影，真是给我很大的惊喜，尤其是最后客车决战，充分利用狭小空间，让本片的精彩程度提升了一个档次，而且前面的动作设计也很干净利落，可以说是网大中的精品了；
还行吧，一半儿都在打来打去，能看下去就是成功了，不妄辛苦
埃及艳后服饰与台词，象征了她的悲剧命运。椅子背面对话暗示布克知道秘密。门镜重叠斗殴加剧了混乱效果。特效非常尴尬。推理部分过于薄弱。
写实风格扫黑片，网大中属于不错的，最后一场在狭小空间的动作戏设计的不错，但是演员表现的痛感不足，也就让看的人觉得不够真实。。谢苗以后估计能上大荧幕
一个做好后拖了两年的电影。实景搞得像动画，人物高清大脸，背景虚化到几乎看不清，这是国产偶像剧的画风。怎么会有如此适合艾米汉莫的人设。
要有女同，要有有色人种，给你辆自行车要不要？啧。
作为网剧还是可以一看的，动作设计不错，情节太拉垮
很标准，中规中矩。虽不是特别出彩，但也没必要说的很烂。一部经典作品被重启就注定会被比较、被评说。但《尼罗河的惨案》看的是什么？看的就是一副英伦范、一种浪漫。作为戏剧，重要的基调是人物，此片还算明确的表述了人物。所以当人物太多，影像无法一一刻画的同时，大侦探用案件推理交代人物关系，这是必然也是巧妙。这正是《尼罗河的惨案》无论电影还是戏剧经久不衰的魅力！ 21世纪的《尼罗河的惨案》怎样表述大众才能满意？？也许它算可以了。
谢苗一口气拍了好多网剧啊，这个确实不错，好看
Kenneth Branagh把所有电影都拍成了话剧……
艾米锤真的亲身演绎什么叫“对于丑人细看也是一种残忍”，他那张脸每次放特写我都忍不住伸手盖眼睛。 一开始氛围感营造的不错通篇围绕一个爱字但前面的节奏有点太拖了。simon和Jacquelin的感情刻画的有点糊里糊涂让人难以辨认到底男方对女方有没有爱情。
3.5吧，东方快车波洛尝试打戏，这部直接开始感情线。林奈特太像女战士不像白富美。没啥阿婆味了，居然硬生生拆散鸳鸯
爱会让人疯狂，爱会让人不惧生死，爱会让人杀人。留心观察到了一些细节，错过了一些细节，想过或许最不可能的人就是犯人，但确实没想到是这样的实施方式。
谢苗没小时候可爱了，但是自带一种苏感…绑匪的三弟还考上过商学院，就这智商吗，绝了。
这玩意原著粉给两星就算给面子了，三星是我抛开原著给的，抛开原著勉强能看。导演别给波洛加戏了，你真想表现自己你就写原创剧本，别糟蹋阿加莎了谢谢。
回想起网友要求众筹不让这导演继续翻拍阿婆的先见之明。盖尔加朵真的是辣
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
