A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
私心加一星吧，还是挺喜欢的。是枝裕和自从拿金棕榈后就沉迷于拍外语片，依旧把玩着过去拍日片的风格，却没什么突破，塑造畸形家庭这个主题翻来覆去的讲也拍不出新的花样了，二流剧本仿佛不是本人所写碎得可怜，流动性太差。演员表现都可以，黑暗中吐露新声也是加分所在。
1.第一幕故事情节过于平淡，节奏偏慢，给观众情绪上的起伏不大
镜头，音乐，演员都很好，可就是喜欢不起来。
便觉察到是枝裕和近年的越来越失“真”。
作為是枝的電影應該是後段那檔。依然是細膩的，演員們也恰如其分，包括電影新秀的李知恩。宋康昊演這角色可說是信手捻來了吧。但整體有如一個童話繪本，用過度溫情的畫筆掩蓋了現實斑駁的底色...剛好最近美國墮胎權議題沸騰，這部片看著也是有點尷尬，我想，他大概是太理想主義了吧...謝謝你的出生，但沒有羽星幸運的那些被拋棄的孩子願意經歷這些嗎?
對女性的關懷(男嬰比女嬰貴憑什麼)以及與我完全相反的生育觀(thank u for being born)、人性尚存温度被放大到如此崇高(一如既往)、所有角色像不存在黑暗面聖潔淨化到一個過於離譜理想化的點(依然一如既往)，但姜東元回孤兒院、洗車、摩天輪都煽情地賺到了我的眼淚
这样的故事本来可以拍的更好看，这样的电影本来可以有更好的故事，虽然说情节的确紧凑，但也丝毫没有带给我什么。另外iu真的演的好吗....这么复杂的角色被她演的如清纯小白花
有良知的人贩子和先遗弃后贩卖亲儿子的杀人犯母亲合伙卖娃之旅，一路坎坎坷坷一路温情脉脉。理性和感性，我都拒绝接受这样的逻辑和情感设定。
他說「現在也不晚」的時間，他在明暗模糊的陰影裡面，轟隆聲很大。好像真心話只有在那種條件下才可以講出口，也只能講一次。
是枝裕和集合了韩影的顶级配置，却拍了部低配版《小偷家族》
比起颠覆更多狗血的感觉。第一次知道Baby Box这种东西，就是说，将 一种危险但无法避免的违法或背德行为 官方化，到底是鼓励这种行为还是保护这些人呢？另外，人类（男的？）对血缘的执着有时真的freaks me out，哪怕它似乎在讲一个后天家庭的故事
果然是是枝裕和，就算有宋康昊，我依旧没看进去。。。
还是那样温柔的是枝裕和，从不刻意煽情的剧情，但却最为感人。他们是掮客，是杀人犯、性工作者，是孤儿，但却不是恶人。（裴斗娜又演女警，梦回李英男哈哈
好的剧作范本。人物动机太明确了：男主没钱，警察要完成KPI，然后就有了猫捉老鼠的游戏。最后男主的困境也没有解决，靠情感支配行动了。
不像是枝裕和拍韩国电影，倒是很像大陆翻拍《小偷家族》。
觉得以是枝裕和扎实的拍摄和剧本能力能够挖掘更为深刻的主题而不是陷于简单的“做坏事人物的人性微光”温情糖水片。
几乎能脑补出李美敬在18年看完《小偷家族》后是何等的兴奋何等的喜爱是枝，于是千方百计也要诚邀是枝赴韩拍摄一部韩版的《小偷家族》。所谓一方水土养一方艺术家是正确的，即便如李安赵婷能将美国故事也拍的入木三分，除了所谓的普世价值，也绝对离不开他们旅居异乡多年而总结出的社会经验与文化洞察结果，看《掮客》的抽离感绝无关乎剧本的文化落差或视听的水平高低，而是这样的“犯罪童话”真很难体现出其环境载体本该携带的那渗入土壤又出自土壤的生命力量，它更像是一部由一位游走于当代东亚社会的无名吟游诗人传唱出的动人民谣，在由多民族多语言演绎各版本之后，被朝鲜民族再次本土化改编而搬上银幕的复刻产物 w/阳
是一个这么救赎的故事！
致力于帮陌生人组建家庭的导演，现在看电影都得当当代艺术看了，得结合导演的所有作品看。IU的角色要是文淇演说不定能更灵一点
便觉察到是枝裕和近年的越来越失“真”。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
