A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
前面好于后面，视觉比较出色吧，光影绚丽转场华丽，略带伤感和小惊悚，没有惊喜。
金曲大赏是吧，这电影是有点吓人，中间我还来了个外卖可把我吓死了
视听技法纯熟，视觉效果炸裂，音乐复古，可惜电影院看不到
这也太好看了吧...没想到现在的retro都是80年代都不够用的，得60年代才能解决问题了。音乐1000分了...奥斯卡不看着办吗？？？
没头没尾，草草收场。想拍凶宅就好好拍凶宅，前面大段被室友算计的戏基本都废的，妈妈那条线也还以为会有点后续，结果啥也没有。老警察更是死的的莫名其妙。唯一的看点就是anya中间在舞厅跳舞那段实在太美了，我们的舞池什么时候能有这样的姑娘。
悬疑的张力有些虎头蛇尾，有太多支线任务反而失焦
反转之前，现代部分上至八旬房东老太，下至妙龄青葱少女，所有女性形象都刻板扁平到堪称“古老”。
好铅黄好表现主义好复古好喜欢，也注定不是一部属于当下的电影，但绝对是一部属于影院的电影。
怎么说呢，影片在前面60年代追忆与梦境转换的闪光之后就开始慢慢步入下坡道路，女主和黑人男友都不甚讨喜，还不如看安雅跳两个小时恰恰舞。
总体还不错 我爱复古风 音乐很棒 故事讲得也还行 剪辑画面都不错
音乐服化道不错双女主表演对于低成本惊悚剧而言很棒。
sound design控看得很舒适，赖特正常发挥，虽说剧本在这种视听强片里无所谓吧，结尾又实在是有些土得掉渣了。
阿基多式的异地女学生寄宿学校开头，今敏式的梦与现实交错，异度空间变异度凶间。再多的经典元素也敌不过一个三流降智剧本。模仿铅黄的配色弄出来的效果却全是CG感。Edgar Wright在Baby Driver后再次展示自己已经江郎才尽。
警察死得好冤……剧本太弱了 情感转折太生硬 演员演技太稚嫩 母女命运神秘的连接似乎直接被放弃了 隐喻不够巧妙 视听上前半段配上音乐把青春片的老套桥段拍得很有趣很精致 到了高潮却平庸到难以忍受 不过看到亡灵畏惧Sandie还是很爽 Sandie安静坐在大火里很美
只有前半段值得称赞，Edgar最让人失望一次。
看得揪心且无趣，现实与过去穿插的情节，为啥我每次都想快进⏩
當然這種暗示了娛樂圈、演藝圈為了成名、上位，被迫或者不得不或者主動獻身各位大佬的存在的確有點看頭，但是和前面一比就俗套了。當然節奏、畫面和音樂是埃德加擅長的部分，但是整體，可不能算得上是今年的最佳影片。
形式大于内容的歌舞mv，视觉听觉风格浓郁都超过了故事本身的冲突和人物的刻画%但是2个女主的美真是被服化道衬托得不可方物啊1。托马辛·麦肯齐 Thomasin McKenzie没输给给安雅。
没什么新意的故事几乎可以用一句话剧透 结尾更是拉胯 除了一贯的音乐和视觉风格在线其余乏善可陈 脱离了铁三角的埃德加赖特纵有鬼斧也砍不出什么神功
以恐怖片来论是失败的，不但没有一丝恐怖之处，甚至因为有不少歌舞，反而还觉得很嗨。至于所谓的向六十年代的致敬，就像是导演在酒吧搭讪美女时的吹嘘，哄骗靠张嘴，脱光了才发现其美学气质根本没多少复古的成分。不过有一说一，有些镜头设计还蛮酷的。最主要的还是两位女主长得太好看了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
