Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
说实话非常差，既没有展现人类和恐龙共存的宏大场景，也没有思考共存的意义与影响。还是老一套的追逐、冒险、救人，反派依旧自负且愚蠢，本因是主角的恐龙更是沦为调料剂，在穷极无聊的剧情中亮个相以示存在。让人眼前一亮的也只有欧文驱赶恐龙的画面，没成想后面就没了，驱赶的了个寂寞。
资本主义儿童动保特工队割韭菜保护韭菜，实话实说真的非常好看
寒假的最后一天休假带儿子到影院去看的。这次是一个完整的故事，比去年要好看
2022.1.22，湾悦城奥斯卡影城，一家4口包场
画面好精致，战车很帅，特别是那个水炮特效好有感觉
陪闺女看的第三部。她关注两个问题：1.阿奇晚上为什么睡不着。2.莱德是怎么被石头压住了脚
烧烤大蚂蚱一口塞不下！看饿了！
爽片爽就完事了！看恐龙很酷的好吗哈哈 而且还被吓到好几次…跟某人不知道多久看的一场电影了 疫情快退散！
3.8 puppies save my day
专门买了一个月的派拉蒙plus会员跟女儿看的，有点意思，合家欢电影。
画风很low, 现在动画片越弄越回去了, 就这个画风不看上映日期，说它是10年前的都没问题~
适合10岁以下的小朋友看，别的没什么好说的了
谢谢你让我知道 美国的片子也能一样的烂 不比国产烂片好那么一丁点
看到一半就想从电影院出来……真是老套到没有一点新意
一部不如一部了，剧情看了个寂寞，我甚至一时复述不出来……
沪北电影院 2号厅 2排7座。Mango小朋友，人生第一次去电影院看的电影。
带锤宝看的~大荧幕上的小狗狗更可爱了~阿奇飞跃高楼（想起速激了）~天天用飞机炸那个云朵吸收器（酷狗狗不差钱）~莱德：周边卖得好，总部差不了。
第一次和儿子在影院看的电影，也是时隔一年第一次进影院。电影不错，适合孩子，纪念一下
好莱坞算是把宇宙概念玩得明明白白，从公园追到世界，看到主演合体，能不激动才怪呢。剧情就是复制粘贴，系列作品中什么卖座就来什么，所以此部混搭着找孩子(公园3)吐毒液(公园1)龙打架(世界1)……然而，细节还是有趣，如山姆尼尔被迅猛龙从“杀手”变成“宠物”吓到(要知道公园1迅猛龙可贡献了果冻颤抖、爪子开门、厨房蛙跳等经典惊悚场景，而在世界中Blue已经带崽认外公了🤣)，像一场跨越世纪的影史对话。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
