Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
非常棒的传记型题材影片，在很多细节上处理得分寸刚刚好！摄影，美术，服化，都较唯美！叙事重点突出，情节丰满且推进有力！虽有理想化和美化，但主要部分还是接近现实的！演员的表现力整体也不错！
自由的鸟不因身处笼中而不自由，高尚的灵魂也不因时代局限而不高尚。隔岸观火评判他人是否完美地受害，或者完美地觉醒，这实在是很容易的。甘谷确实不是月亮，能够永恒地发光，可是一朵玫瑰在泥潭里浸透了黑色，却不同流合污，依然地、决然地选择了继续芳香。这不足够吗？这已很足够。
以电影的方式来讲述甘古拜的故事，是对她最真诚的致敬方式。
但她的自强不息与善良让人敬佩
有的地方这个配乐吧，就像什么企业宣传片似的
印度🇮🇳都拍了，我们呢？？虽然是真人真事改编，但是人家总理也是能见到，并且还赠送了玫瑰。有美化成分，但是至少维护了一份该有的权益。我們正常女性的思維裡，還有哪些不自知裹小腳的地方呢！！！在古甘演講的時候，也在思考是不是普通人對妓女這個行業太多歧視而不自知。
30秒，我怎么可能在30秒完成哀悼，告诉妈妈我想你，这十二年我究竟经历了什么？
虽然剧情上有诸多硬伤，这位女演员的演绎也太过霸总了一些，但桑杰导演还是保证了观众视听上的享受，最后花车游街一幕也算颇为动人。勉强三星半。
中国人现在的幸福，是靠人民的军队守护的。这部电影，不过是用影视的手段，将当年的场景再现而已，致敬先烈。只说这场战斗，打的非常激烈。放跑了美军，依然是一个巨大的遗憾，但这就是事实。
22.05.30 3.5
七连实到一人时破防了，历史意义打过战略意义的一场战役，这盛世因为所有的先烈，一代人有一代人的使命！
女主美得我心颤，一出现危机就是男人出来解救这个也太没意思了
拍得很美，但是拍得真不行
印度喜欢这种长叙事150分钟打底，看一场电影比较实惠
大年初四九点半去看的午夜场，去把这段战役完成。电影还在，有着不少武侠化的桥段，为了给大众普及这场战斗也算见仁见智了，毕竟不是纪录片，唯有强大才能对得起这血肉书写的胜利
讲一个好故事怎么简洁都出彩
比上一部好一点，但坐在我旁边的男同事说，履带车开到山顶太不真实了，回来想想还真的是
印度不是一个男尊女卑的国家吗？甘古拜的成功无疑挑战了这一现象吧？
甘古拜原本是有钱人家的小姐，结果被渣男所骗直接被卖到了窑子里。这里面可没有任何人会在乎你的感受心疼你，吃人不吐骨头的地方。
今天是2022年2月24日，俄罗斯在乌克兰东部顿巴斯地区发起军事进攻。心情复杂，愿世界和平重临，感谢我们的先烈和已经强大起来的祖国。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
