Min Ji-suk runs a "ticket bar"where customers can purchase tickets for certain "services"in the town of Sokcho in Gangwon-do. She hires Miss Yang (Ahn So-young), Miss Hong (Lee Hye-young), and Se-young (Jeon Se-young) through the employment agency. Miss Yang and Miss Hong, who are well experienced in this type of business, are used to accepting propositions from customers. But Se-young, who is dating a college student named Min-su, rejects all requests for sexual favors. When Min-su professes to having problems with his tuition and finances, Se-young reassures him that she will procure the necessary funds for him. When the bar's clientele begins to dwindle because of Se-young, Ji-suk reprimands her severely. Se-young develops a close relationship with a Captain Pak and even allows him to sleep with her. She asks Captain Pak to find Min-su employment on a boat, but when Min-su comes to Sokcho for his new job, he sees how Se-young has been making her living. Shocked, he turns his back on the job and leaves. When he eventually returns to Sokcho, he scathingly denounces Se-young's morality and severs their relationship. Decades ago, Ji-suk had stumbled into the bar business in a desperate effort to support her husband, who was serving time in prison; she later left him voluntarily out of shame and moral degradation. Concerned that Se-young will end up with the same fate, Ji-suk asks Min-su to meet with her. She begs him not to abandon Se-young, but he flatly refuses. Ji-suk reacts by pushing Min-su into the sea, and suffers a mental breakdown that lands her in a psychiatric institution.
讲述北野武早期的经历,着重表现在法兰西座跟师父学艺,逐步成长,最后自己单飞全国出名,这种离别跟师徒间的情感,着实动人
聚焦小人物,体现大事件。全场眼眶湿了好几次,更是第一次感受到志愿军战歌的力量与气势。
其实前面真的麻麻的。最后那顿饭,火灾,加上浅草小子,眼睛还是酸了。
将舞台和时间限定在了最小范围内,减小了大场面调度的负担和出错的概率,同时还能以小见大,老谋深算感(褒义
励志的有点中规中矩,一个想法是赵四的表演方式是不是从北野武这获得的灵感?
同《默片解说员》一样,拍出了绘声绘色的时代挽歌,也像北野武演唱的那首插曲,给我恰到好处的抚慰和忧伤。结尾的高跟鞋和葬礼,让我想起无意听到爱人与前男友诉前情的徐志胜,一句“说了这么多句,一个梗都没有啊”便化解了尴尬,喜剧演员都擅于用嬉笑打趣掩饰、传递情感的细腻与豁达,所以窥探他们的内心和过往也请小心翼翼。
作为师徒情谊的剧情片勉强凑合能看,但作为北野武的传记片则完全失真,在片中你看不到小武这个角色身上任何的复杂性,也不会觉得他和银幕外的那位鬼才大叔是同一个人,此外叙事重点的摇摆,流于表面且投机的时代唏嘘和无节制的煽情也进一步拉低了整体的水准,所以这片再次告诉我们,很多时候拍传记片不如拍纪录片!
与其说是个人发迹史,不如说是记录了一段师生情。没有预期中的个性张扬,甚至可以说是俗气的讲述方式,但够真挚动人。影帝这种眼神内置孩童式纯真温柔还略呆萌的气质多少会让人有点出戏,但强大自我如北野武也确实很难“演”出来吧,以独立故事来看其实演绎得很不错了,包括大泉洋老师!以及门胁麦可以说是漫才恋人专业户了,嗓音又那么好听……霓虹的漫才心酸史还真是总能拍得触动人心。
开局的感觉不必要的布属,白天取回尸体的必要性没有突出,小环节有预感,一人战坦克又来了。但演员的认真加一分
很久没有集体看过电影了。。。看哭了,那个年代的人,信仰真是大于一切
挺好的,比长津湖好很多,没有过度大场面的奢华,而是注重人物的塑造,唯一不喜欢的地方是太多次子弹发射动画/慢镜头/MV既视感,来个一次就行了,不用回回都这样
两位主演不说,门胁麦太有韵味了!铃木保奈美一如既往地美。电影本身比较普通。
前中段到章宇牺牲前可以给到5星的,中后段大永为主和美军对峙部分感觉有点拉可以给3星,到与John对手戏以及结尾可以给4星,总的来说是一部4星电影。最后1颗星给中国军人。
这是一部真正的电影。
短小精悍,聚焦于小人物,小事件,这样真的能够做到完成度很高。但是后来那个小狙击手,真的就能马上神枪手上身吗?小哭包真的就能在老父亲一样的班长牺牲之后马上整理好自己的情绪,调整作战姿态吗?主角光环有点浓厚。小哭包到后来的转变缺少一些铺垫(有但不够)。并且,我感觉有视角上的转换,前部分主角是刘文武,后面他牺牲之后主角才是小哭包。为什么要这样?好像现在我国主旋律战争片都喜欢刻画小兵的成长,隔壁《水门桥》也是,易烊千玺的戏份不算多也不算出彩,顶多算个见证者,参与者,幸存者。这样第三人称的视角,放在这样煽情的战争片里真的好吗?
提前看的点映,今天上映了来打分,这次张译算是配角,章宇完全hold住了。导演把这场虽小但重要的战争拍的格外扣人心弦。不敢说春节档口碑最好的,但是质量完全过关,冷枪冷炮,热血沸腾。
这电影说实话张艺谋的风格很淡,毕竟是挂名导演。故事倒是非常直接,不含糊直接干,如果能再往深度挖掘些会更好。
老谋子渐渐会拍商业片,但还有点问题。最明显两点:那个子弹的特效太假,以及志愿军战士一口大白牙。
将舞台和时间限定在了最小范围内,减小了大场面调度的负担和出错的概率,同时还能以小见大,老谋深算感(褒义
想起北野武于书里写他在遭遇车祸后,
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved