Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
正片😲😳🙃🥴
作为科幻剧，差。作为爱情片，美！这应该是个披着科幻片外衣的爱情片
我喜欢这个故事五星！Daniel友情出演一星～^_^女主真的好美，不光是容貌，而是每一个零件都在发光。回忆里对话那一段真的太棒了。我知道你听得到所以留下我最后的告白给你。因为我了解你我爱你，也同样了解你对我的爱，我知道我会成为你的追忆，我知道你会听到看到它，那就让我用最后的时间留下最美的回忆给你。
感谢吴彦祖。一直以来大家都是中文里夹英文，终于有人英文里夹中文了。
视效不错，一切都很好看，人、光线、场景；剧情极度老套cliche，不过吴彦祖还挺好玩的
有一點期望太高了，一直覺得會有反轉⋯故事還是比較流暢的就是編劇有點單薄
沉溺于美好爱情中的人们，还有谁又愿意醒来？
这种装神弄鬼的科幻悬疑动作文艺爱情的片我还挺喜欢。可能一些镜头比较喜欢。设定很不错，可能本可以成为神作，然而重点放在文艺爱情上还有点过了头～
这个机器谁发明创造的，应该不是金刚狼吧，为什么不自己用给金刚狼用，如果是买的那么他那里买的别人可以买到吗，看着看着突然冒出来个吴彦祖，但是自从吴彦祖死了之后，我都看不懂剧情在讲啥了
谜一样的女人，沉溺与回忆里，终老，后期就看不下去了
前期的流水账使得后期的优秀爆发没有能够得到最大的用处。
你以为的反转都没有…最后就是备胎无私奉献几十年？？
故事偏情感文艺多点，很平静地在讲故事。
女主迫不得已找男主完成任务，两人相爱，其中回来找过男主但被黑警抓回去，与黑警合作的富豪儿子担心父亲的私生子继承遗产，想杀害母子，被女主救了孩子，女主牺牲自己。最后男主选择永远活着美好的回忆中。
随着算力速度的的加快过去总是容易被太快遗忘
美国迈阿密成了水上哥谭，金刚狼和<马戏之王>的女歌手再续前缘，末世感的设定掩盖不住小家子气的内核，片子披着诺兰的外壳讲了一个拖沓的悬疑爱情故事。
电影结束一个人在电影院哭，太伤的回忆涌上心头。结尾不喜欢
事实证明把简单的故事通过叙事手法和结构形式变复杂高端不是谁都能掌握的技巧。故事只值两星，把简单的故事说的枯燥乏味。但是架不住丽贝卡太有魅力和风情，以及休叔丽贝卡吴彦祖三个好身材，忍不住再加一星。晚礼服包裹下露出的女性肌肤太性感了。
老套故事结构下包装了一层科幻和反阶层的外衣，狼叔演得吧也只能算是一般般，因为吴彦祖想看的话我劝退你打消这个念头吧，他在全片中加起来的时间不超过10分钟…该剧的悬疑属性极弱，未来水世界的设定还不如当年的未来水世界。只能算很一般的一部片。
烂得无与伦比，啥破机器居然能以上帝视觉展现记忆，并且连没看见或不在场的场景都能显示出来，真是牛了尼玛的比...吴彦祖好歹也是个贩毒老大，居然被黑大妈轻松团灭...
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
