A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
《One shot》
截止2022年2月1日，豆瓣有2787人标记看过。1镜头晃的头晕。2有几处动作设计不错，比如在箱子下开枪打腿，然后横蹿出去击毙。3敌人也太多了，源源不绝。4美军看守基地也太脆弱了吧。
剧情啥的可以完全忽略，就是一部特种兵演示的爽片
经典保护人质套路，亮点匮乏，枪战摄制粗糙缺写实，预算少场景难免因陋就简，长镜头肉搏可圈可点，阿金斯动作领域新成就达成
这就是一个三流电影团队出来的效果。他们已经很努力，观众都能看得到。采用一镜到底的拍摄方式，故事既结合热点，又有激烈的打斗场面，在观点上讲究平衡。然而总觉得缺口气，逻辑上欠严密，细节上很粗糙。导演过度突出主角光环，给了其过多的打斗场面。本来应该干脆利落，结果拖泥带水，让观众着急。
You came to my 家，我真的会笑
一镜到底是本片的失败之处。电影让人看到头晕，这样的一镜到底不要也罢。
一镜到底加跟拍，仿佛身临其境，更能感受枪战和搏击的惊险刺激。男主特战队员，一招一式，动作规范，整个场面有点像训练课。后面手雷和火箭筒怎么不用了？那么多恐怖分子就一辆汽车，来个二三辆还有点合理性。
这部片子其实很适合上网飞，商业效益和热度会高很多，阿金斯还是只能在碟市片当主演，一直都红不起来，现在这类传统严肃风格硬汉演员已经不吃香了，现在动作男演员得会打+幽默才行，要不就得有里维斯那样的帅脸和气质，阿金斯这脸也不对那味儿，也许时也命也吧，他需要哪个比较有名的好莱坞导演带他一把
这么强的主角光环，这么多的现场漏洞，那么多的1vN，太弱化匪徒了，居然评分这么高，我也是服了，真实战场上早就挂了，给高分的都是些什么人，，，
剧情感觉硬伤很大 女主双商在线怎么就那个结局 汗 不过回忆时互诉衷肠还是很感动
6分，纯粹是给颜值在线的白莲花女主……
一镜到底的枪战爽片，有种电脑游戏的感觉。
一镜到底还是挺惊艳 动作表现也是很有看头 阿金斯潜行暗杀几个敌人的时候最帅 就是故事上细节欠佳 基地居然连个机枪岗都没有…其次就是枪战看起来总有种很廉价的感觉
我的天啊大哥这是怎么拍的啊？？？还是枪战这是怎么做到的怎么排练出来的我的天啊，还是个B级片，我的天啊这是何等发达的电影工业
阿金斯终于演了个能看的动作片。one shot 一次机会；one shot 一镜到底。
太棒了，本来对枪战片不感兴趣，但是这个一镜到底实在是太真实太紧张太震撼了，动作设计几近完美，虽然知道不可能全片一个长镜头，但是真心没啥剪接破绽，完全能肯定得剪辑就一出，其他都是猜测，真是一部不可多得的小成本战争佳作！阿金斯还不大火也是遗憾，啥时候他能接点大男主的大制作该多好～
大牌云集，其实还可以的。 吴彦祖在里面的那段，有点好玩。
未来海平面上涨淹没城市这个设定我还挺喜欢的，迈阿密这个水之城也很迷人，看得出来狼叔真的只想谈恋爱，还有阿祖在英文里夹中文真的有毒。
科幻框架下的悬疑故事。当人的记忆可读，警察就可以通过该技术追查真相。当女主邂逅男主又突然消失，男主能做的就是利用这项技术去找到并读取每个与这个女人认识的人的记忆来寻找她的下落。在不同人的记忆拼凑中，女主的形象在不断反转，一会儿善良一会儿阴邪，她到底是个什么样的人，是本片最大的悬疑。丽贝卡·弗格森贡献了少有的尤物形象演出：长发披肩、身材窈窕、长腿诱人。影片前半段节奏稍慢，稍显无聊，后半段真相渐渐浮出水面，颇为精彩。影片很多的剧情都前后呼应，男主对女主说的话：“很多故事结局悲伤，但中间欢乐”也点出了本片的主旨。男主最后可以选择永远活在他认为最值得怀念的美好回忆里。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
