喜剧，讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人，周旋于女友和未来岳父之间，因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人，认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).
精美，reference High Noon的街道和配乐还挺妙的。
黑白的质感非常好，以为会很惊心动魄，但只有简单离别，从一个男孩的角度，确确实实只存在这些小细节。
片中父亲提出要举家搬迁到英格兰生活，却遭到母亲坚决反对，反对理由是不想让孩子因为爱尔兰口音被同龄人嘲讽，但实际上是母亲自己不愿离开故乡。作为中国人，这就根本不是个问题。这种情况放在国内，还争什么啊，父母全都去海对岸工作了，留个祖孙相依为命的留守家庭。
For the ones who stayed. For the ones who left. And for all the ones who were lost. 确实看出很多《一一》的味道，动荡的年月里更加感慨。
提名剧本奖个人无法认同，台词镜头都很好，但是剧情有点工业化了。离乡的挣扎，一个没出过国的东北人共情了。8.2分
导演功力不够，以孩童视角看战争、动乱对生活的影响，成功的影片很多，这部的情绪传达以及童心和现实的对抗融合做得很一般了。拍成黑白的用意过于私人。
大型室外情景剧既视感，小男主互动角色，除了爷爷奶奶两个有点人性（妈妈也有点情绪），其他角色感觉都是棋子。家里和街道场景太缺乏生活痕迹了，暴动完路边整洁的比刚铺完沥青还新，可能导演对自己的童年回忆加了超级滤镜吧
难道黑白色的童年与故土回忆都很真实，电影与舞台上的想象力才能带来彩色吗？多的是影像上的调度，但置身动乱中的临场感稍弱，还是说我们都代入了天真无邪的童年视角呢？60年代爱尔兰的贝尔法斯特从时间、空间上都距离当下的我太遥远了～
疑惑的镜头和疑惑的色彩运用。并不能好好回忆的回忆录
看了后悔的程度。肯尼斯布拉纳先生，您不会演也就罢了，现在连导也不会了吗？尽管剧情并不累赘，但这一个小时四十分钟的电影依旧显得无比漫长，节奏实在太差劲了。大多数情况下的黑白和彩色的转变都没有意义，所谓“电影艺术照亮动荡生活”的观点根本不需要这么表达。情绪破碎，故事刻意，仿佛揪着观众领子强迫大家认同这是一部【冲奖】片一样。
在只有1%的人想要离开故乡的地方迫切地离开了她，又用99%的迫切回归故乡。“GO. Go Now. And don't look back”，丹奇奶奶和曼斯爷爷挑起乡愁的大梁，貌合神离的父母，兄长，特意安插的同桌的她，都没法在感情上说服观众。黑白儿童视角片就叫《罗马》？
黑白格调，有历史感的同时不失唯美，儿童视角，动乱冲突依然看到儿时的快乐和对故乡的留恋。似乎也就能想到这些，还有就是英式英语吧（大概）。7/10分
肯尼思布拉纳的导演才能属实有限，开头那混乱的调度，炫技是为了让观众头疼吗？视点过于散乱。但后面渐入佳境，情感还是加分的，布拉纳拍出了那种乡愁，尤其是跑路前的犹豫不决
虽然很一般，但是看到最后我还是有点莫名其妙的感动。
调度很差，一到群戏就晃个不停 拿六十年代的乡恋做幌子 实际年代感与布景一点都没做好 特别出戏 居然还得了奥斯卡最佳原创剧本 台词也很装逼
喜欢孩子和他的爷爷奶奶在一起的对话！画面很精致，但总有种在滤镜下画面有点奇怪的感觉！ 老人看着看着自己的儿孙们离开贝尔法斯特：go, go now, don’t look back!I love u son ,萌生出一些感动！其实我们的一生一直都在告别！
下午茶配的小资格调电影一样儿，画面看着赏心悦目，故事性并不强。生活如水。
调度很差，一到群戏就晃个不停 拿六十年代的乡恋做幌子 实际年代感与布景一点都没做好 特别出戏 居然还得了奥斯卡最佳原创剧本 台词也很装逼
作为一个前不久刚读过《什么也别说》的人，我是能够理解导演在这样一个命题下所想要表达的一些东西的，也能够理解有一些问题现在仍不便提及。
虽然都是很零碎的片段，拍得还是挺可爱的。很有French Cinema的气质，比如类似于Cléo的色彩运用，比如对日常生活的侧重，比如使人想起Les 400 coups的主角；但缺少的是对“all the ones who were lost”的表达
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
