Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
美国退伍兵的题材，可能只有老美比较理解吧，我个人只是觉得一阵伤感，把战争带给全世界，结果自己的心里也是撕裂的
狗电影+公路电影，最爱的两个电影元素的结合体，居然无聊到如此。影片暴露了查宁真的只是个没文化的可怜的大只佬。从片名、剧情再到表演，看到的只有粗鲁和粗糙。
一个人，一条狗，一段旅程…很喜欢一段戏，男主回家看妻子女儿，画面里只是放了狗狗看着男主进了屋子又出来，然后失望的回到车里把本来送给女儿的玩具扔了狗子玩…男主的私事没有直接描写太多，更没有过多的煽情和卖惨，但是观众都能够明白许多…这就是电影的独特语言…给狗狗写的日记却叫I love me…因为那些写给狗狗的话不但给狗听，更是给自己打气和安慰。医疗或许可以治好身体的创伤，但不一定能够填上心里的缺口…但是感同身受者互相扶持反而有独特的疗效…哪怕是一起上过战场的狗狗队友。“退役老兵的苦没人懂”这种话题已经被无数次搬上大荧幕了，但是以狗狗视觉拍了段公路片倒是挺新颖的…
无功无过。’隔离7+7 4.28-5.04’
观看的蓝光原盘，视听效果一流，但剧情比较平，虽然看起来不累，但也没什么惊喜，属于爱狗人士的菜。
1⃣️查宁塔图姆好帅2⃣️好美式一片3⃣️好仓促一结尾
导演到底如果把这部电影定义成family movie,就不应该加入2女一男的灵异事件。太煞风景了
敏感一点也没啥问题！老公真的既不能给人提供安全感，还不站在女主这边！啥也不行！
毫无亮点的公路片，动物题材也没什么加分，也一点也不好笑。
导演到底如果把这部电影定义成family movie,就不应该加入2女一男的灵异事件。太煞风景了
每一只狗活着，都是为了生存或者帮助人类；有些人活着，纯粹是在浪费粮食
不只是关于狗，更是关于人的温情公路片。退伍军人和凶猛军犬的互相救赎。钱老板许久不见，身材依旧。
为啥都在吹杰克吉伦哈尔的演技？演Henry的演员根本没露面就靠声音演的都比他好。
这是忠犬救赎人的故事，老套又突兀，勉强看吧。
讲狗狗的故事，也是讲老兵的故事。平静却细腻。周一晚上一个人开车去电影院，在只有我一个人的影厅里看完，没有人陪伴的观影体验却更契合这部电影。People don't know what it takes to be a hero. 这句台词也许就是对全片最好的概括吧。
应该属于公路片吧，同样的感情，不同的表达方式。相似的经历和处境，无法重返战场，使得和狗狗相处的过程，更多的是同病相怜和对现实的无奈。没有讲述什么大道理，只是惺惺相惜的“兄弟”。 ps.最近电影看的少了，越发得看不进去，一个半小时的片子，还要分两次才能看完。还是要沉下心来！
窗户里挥手和地铁里那幕有点吓人，结局有点小意外，总体来讲还不错
没看过原版 我觉得很不错 也许是真相太残酷我也很jake一样很崩溃 一场表演课
“Thank you for your service 😎🖕” 哈哈哈哈
查宁塔图姆和一条狗的公路旅行故事，没什么亮点，爱狗人士应该挺喜欢这个。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
