A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
“和解”难，但也很治愈。相对“希望”的渺茫，“和解”是更现实的力量，对于个人要求也更严格。在信息化的今天，价值的多元，必然产生更多的碰撞，我们更需要“和解”。有时“和解”不能成功，但也理解到对方了不是。
非常真实的日式感受和叙事。大家都在做对的事情，要怎么和对方妥协？
缺点依旧是低龄化和甩不掉的山寨元素，黑豹蜘蛛侠超人哨兵一目了然。画面效果方面，影片色彩氛围不行，材质也挺差的。进步在终于知道模拟解算的重要性，以及做原创配乐。希望口型动画再对准些吧，已经是行业标配要求了。给自家乐园打广告纯粹恶心。★★☆/5.9
一张报纸，揉成团，再把它铺平。虽然父亲最后觉悟出要和别人达成和解，可是伤痕刻在每个人的心里，永远都不能抚平。说不上很差，但也不至于是佳片
题材无新意，又臭又长，小日本这种恭恭敬敬态度毫无代入感，冲突点平淡无火花，内卷还是要看内地才行，可惜不过审；港台来拍的话估计好看很多，小日本真心不适合拍这种题材....
正能和负能一旦传播和影响，杀伤力都很惊人。喜欢里面小城的各种画面，出海，超市，友邻的关系，一如大多日本电影的日常。
老生常谈且过于规整:无视霸凌的学校、没有好好倾听女) L心声的父亲、无形施压的新闻媒体、日本人骨子里被放大的罪感意识，成为连锁反应酿成- -系列悲剧。透过一-场本来可以从源头上避免的交通事故/社会事件,-定程度上反映了日本人的民族劣根性。最通透也最喜欢的角色是藤原季节。
孤单的时候记得看看天空，也许会有海豚游过，治愈当下的不幸
熊二：外星黑科技太上头了，是春节档唯一的3D片，而且还能看
还好小孩最后一段也不想看了不需要继续陪他熬了，看得头痛，完全不懂儿童动画搞成这样的意义在哪。
#GRFF34 日本人的处世哲学真的莫名其妙到一个我费解的地步 死的死疯的疯 别和解了 操刀子去把那个爹劈了就世间万物可爱了 信我
【GRFF2021】全员生活发生巨变，悲痛、混乱、暴躁、压抑，持续施压令人窒息。对花音造成二次伤害的卡车司机隐身了，很难不在意。回顾本片，记忆点是突然发生事故的瞬间和海豚云油画背后的父女两两相望。
一个人的悲剧变成多个人的悲剧，才明白过来，一切都太糟糕了！
也就是电影里面这种偏执固执的父亲能改变，现实生活中太难了
与自己和解的过程 很久没有过电影结束全场鼓掌的时刻了
哭了个一塌糊涂。整场下来，和隔了几个座位的姑娘竞赛抽泣了好几轮。应该是好电影吧，演员真的出类拔萃。虽然不喜欢的点也很多，只是对于那些我感到臃肿、疲软的地方，现在竟然连想掐除的力气都没了。就，不针对这一部电影，而是近年来很多日影都让我深觉疲软。没法感受到制作者对于电影的野心与欲望这件事已经发生得过于频繁，我常常想，他们为什么要选择电影呢？倒不是要求什么类型的片子都要实验，要玩转技巧（过于极端）。起码不要所有片子，无论有没有高开，都在镜头语言上无限下行吧。那为什么要用电影呢？说回本片，其实如果喜欢这类题材，追求演技表达，又或者对常见叙事手法不过敏的话，它确是很值得看的一部。我并没有觉得自己买票买亏了，开场关键情节（防剧透）的那段的拍摄我很喜欢，感觉会记非常久，而空白这个名字也十分适合，难得。
谁都有无法和解的一部分吧 那还是得需要时间
也就是电影里面这种偏执固执的父亲能改变，现实生活中太难了
话说没想到我有生之年会看熊出没系列。。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
