A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
好看的热闹戏文，（不知道是不是粉丝滤镜）布拉纳老师导的虽然不好但看着也不讨厌，甚至如果有下一集的话还会去看
故事多少有些仓促而无趣。因为没看过原著，所以也无从判断到底是原著还是改编的问题。但新加入的种族和同性的元素，显然对剧情推进毫无帮助，那就品得相当多余了不是。
10岁时，他又在《赤子威龙》（又名《给爸爸的信》、《父子武状元》）中再次饰演李连杰的儿子——巩固。
黄赌毒与扫黑除恶，东北味十足。
还是无尽旖旎的大好风光，还是帅气倜傥的胡子侦探，和第一部“东方快车谋杀案”配置相同，只是他并不是波洛。和喜欢第一部的理由一样，我太爱看这些赏心悦目的画面了，美丽震撼的金字塔、神秘蜿蜒的尼罗河，还有娇艳夺目的女主角们，相信如果阿婆在世亲眼看了，也不会过于抗拒吧。
烂活大赏，上一个弱智桥段还没演完，下一个脑瘫情节就登场上演，哈哈哈哈哈。华丽烂片，风景不错人拍得丑，剧情提笔瞎写魔改像土味短视频，哦不对还没有短视频好看，这电影可以剪辑出预告片真的很不容易了。
上次看谢苗的电影还是新少林五祖和赤子威龙，没想到现在已经都38岁了，还挺精神的，依稀可见小时候的模样，他是真会功夫吗？
前半部分过于拖沓和后半部分调查的缩减使得原本优秀的故事一定程度上被削减了吸引力
3.5星7分左右。电影延续了东方快车的镜头美感，遗憾的是相较于东方剧情的改编更加不严谨，结尾甚至可以用潦草来形容。电影开头的战争和菠萝的胡子和案子本身没有一毛钱关系，删掉也没问题。政治正确元素倒是随处可见。但是画面确实没得说，镜头语言绝美。
没看过书也半路猜到凶手，推理真的啥也没拍出来
我可太喜欢这个结局了，又蠢又坏的西蒙最后和他的假装不在一起的女朋友一起挂了，就他妈赶紧照进现实，让马熊cp葬在一起吧。群戏太棒了，就是吧其实西蒙的不在场证明明显有漏洞啊，还有布克他妈说红色颜料找不到的时候其实就已经看得出问题了
有点失望，虽然场景越来越漂亮，但节奏不如老版，波洛也毫无个性，中间溜出去七八分钟看奥运，热烈祝贺葱桶夺冠！
Kenneth Branagh把所有电影都拍成了话剧……
服化道不错，埃及风光也很美，但实在是拖沓，一个多小时才进入正片，推理的部分也不够精彩，感觉就是让一堆明星华丽地走一下过场，莫名的歌舞也蛮无聊。
6.5分。其实如果不清楚原作，也没看过老版的话，这个故事也不是不能看。但既然翻拍经典，那自然是免不了要进行比较。服化道这种硬件来看的确是进步太多太多了，可惜Kenneth Branagh太有想法，加了一大堆的私货，还给侦探珀洛不断加戏，使得整体的故事非常“散”。当然Gal Gadot还是没话说，各种大镜头打上去真的是美艳不可方物呢~~
这波洛身手矫健的让我出戏 然后就是啥元素都有一点 但都很平庸 埃及风光好看但也没那么好看 蜻蜓点水加了对同性恋进去 又没啥戏份 处处都不痛快 阿婆最擅长的挖掘人性的部分也没有深入拍 唯一让我稍微喜欢一点的 竟然是最后从尼罗河镜头拉上去 然后转场到伦敦泰晤士河的镜头
拆什么不好！非得拆经典？之所以称为经典，已经不是一般二般人能动的了。导演别在是个傻瓜吧？
老版的逻辑更好，这部硬加上黑色角色和女同，唉，真是zz正确 都要放在剧情之上。
开场以为误入1917，波洛前史基本另开了同人小说，最大的亮点可能是追风筝的人？多条爱情线有些过于泛滥，反而失去了阿婆出其不意的深情浪漫，可能导演本来也无意展开推理过程，加入了不少喜剧冒险元素，每次搬运尸体的女童子军和最后的木乃伊终极cos都有点诡异的恶趣味。
悬疑很工整，伏笔也都很工整，所有人的表演都无功无过中规中矩，可能是受限于经典的剧本吧（但不懂为啥要翻拍），多加一星给埃及的风光，原来金字塔边上也是坑坑洼洼并不工整的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
