Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
看起来非常不真实，但真实的确实吵架的时候。
看着两个三十几岁的人在像两个高三的学生一样吵架，我由衷的觉得，毛晓彤挺好看啊！
看完我才发现 艺术源于生活而等于生活的话就是废话文学 想体会这样的故事我自己去过日子就完了我看你干嘛
我要给这个电影打五星好评！！！
故事老套无新意，CP感很弱！
早就过了耳听爱情的年纪。再来一次也是一样的。落空的愿望，嘭地一声关上的门，晾不完的衣服，一个人走的夜路。那是谁说的，追求幸福好像成了女生的枷锁，如果一个女人展现给别人她过得不幸福，仿佛就坠入万丈深渊。
分手后：女主陆鹿珊去重庆轮岗，买房。男主江宇离开老白创业公司，去杭州搞失物招领app（就像属于我们的2019 我永远不会忘记）。
除了结局都很真实啊，爱是爱的，就看能不能挺过磨合期了
早就过了耳听爱情的年纪。再来一次也是一样的。落空的愿望，嘭地一声关上的门，晾不完的衣服，一个人走的夜路。那是谁说的，追求幸福好像成了女生的枷锁，如果一个女人展现给别人她过得不幸福，仿佛就坠入万丈深渊。
结尾有些刻意营造的大团圆结局，前面还是挺真实的，热恋~疏离
2021年最后一部电影，2022年第一部电影，也是很久以来第一部完整看完的国产电影，虽然剧情略显俗套，幸运的是没有太多煽情片段
这个真的是有惯性的吗甚至罪恶感都没有很多，以为自己完全不会在意的也半夜失眠了呢可是。
为了吵架而吵架，为了分手而分手。。。如果不是元旦度过时间，就不会看这部。。。
就很普通，普通的优点，普通的缺点，太普通了，普通中的普通
三十而已的二搭加上演员请就位的打包，日常生活就像白水一样，拍的太电视剧化了，以及——故事没有任何悬念。
故事老套狗血却很现实，到底是男的渣，还是女的要求过多，刚认识时多甜蜜，分手的时候就多虐。狗狗病了为啥不打车，手机怎么就没电的那么是时候，一年不长也不短，是时候换个新对象了，你俩不适合。
像是朋友的恋爱史一样 很熟悉的一些桥段那种 但是也确实很平 好的前任就是像死了一样互不打扰 有的话在一起的时候好好说 不要寄希望于自我感动和消遣 不会再遇到了
奔着养鱼cp去的，但剧情略空洞。就临睡前的电影吧。
客观来说还是比较适合情侣看的一部爆米花片，传统套路，没啥亮点。
就是很及格，两个演技派的完成任务痕迹很明显。不懂那些去影院看这种片子的人们的心态是什么。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
