剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 司徒紫雪 3小时前 :

    双方无论善恶都犯了个致命错误,那就是以上帝视角观察后的代入和干涉。无论神话故事里的神仙,还是动物世界里的摄影者,大家公认的一个规则就是只观看不干涉,干涉的结果就是破坏了原本的规律,以至于对双方都带来直接或间接的伤害。所以说作为普通人来讲偷窥最大的伤害通常不是被窥者,是偷窥者,没有强大的意志和理性很难不深陷其中,这也是职业偷窥者例如特务机构所必须训练的。所以说请慎重。

  • 多俨雅 5小时前 :

    比想象中要好看很多,反转再反转,一开始以为是后窗套路,没想到玩出了花样

  • 在雅韶 7小时前 :

    罗兰女神,特别善用抽烟看书的镜头,包括在无耻混蛋中的。

  • 勾悦媛 0小时前 :

    很好看的片子,当你以为自己是猎人的时候,其实是猎物。西德妮斯威尼真是天赋异禀

  • 心岚 0小时前 :

    Sydney要成婊系套路了,刘承羽真的拉气好强。

  • 司寇念露 1小时前 :

    前半部分过于细碎,直接导致后半部分节奏像开了倍速。即便如此,我也能给到中等偏上的分数。Mélanie Laurent应该还可以更好。对女主出门后妆台上渐渐降下的粉末那一幕印象深刻。

  • 敏璇珠 2小时前 :

    喜欢影片的都市质感,但可惜后期崩得太厉害了。要是不出现中二的蛇蝎情节,就止于刺激的寻觅,或许电影的定位会更明确一点,而不是现在的一通乱炖。

  • 太叔英纵 8小时前 :

    精神病诊所象征着父权体系下对女性力量的绝对控制和禁锢,在机制下的集体沉默,在理性话语系统的统治中完全失语,书籍象征着意识的初步觉醒。舞会象征着对父权体系的一场集体反抗。双女主互为镜像,女生应该帮助女生。梅拉尼也是很厉害了,从演员蜕变出导演该有的思想和风范,期待更好的梅拉尼罗兰。

  • 宁飞雨 1小时前 :

    当你凝望深渊的时候,深渊也在凝望你。当你自以为是“上帝”的时候,你早已落入“上帝”的圈套。如果没有结局的“复仇”整体会更好。

  • 拱蕙兰 4小时前 :

    最后的结局还是挺让人舒服的😎四个人一个都别想逃…

  • 力孤晴 3小时前 :

    结局有点意思,你站在桥上看风景,看风景的人也在看你!

  • 守飞捷 9小时前 :

    表面看是悬疑片,其实算是披着悬疑片下的三级片吧,情色的场面真的是不少,氛围营造的也是可以。剧情前半段除情爱场面外都较为平淡,后半段的大反转刚开始觉得有点小意外,但又觉得有些刻意了,中间也有很多逻辑不通的地方,最后的结局是真的没有想到还会有反转。总体来说,虽说有不少缺陷,但整体故事还是比较吸引人的。

  • 回初柳 9小时前 :

    后半段我感觉从剧情到人设都崩盘了,编剧和导演都没有把握住

  • 城陶宜 7小时前 :

    错误总是由微不足道的事情开头.农夫与驴教会你别贪得无厌.但上层人知道寓言故事只是用来束缚奴隶.好奇心好比du瘾.总能战胜道德观.以为自己是观鸟者.其实自己只是任人摆布的笼中鸟.

  • 尉平心 3小时前 :

    哈哈,好奇害死猫,故事讲的不错,最后眼睛弄瞎的反转有点多余。

  • 婷初 3小时前 :

    当代讽刺性的悬疑故事,过于冗长,结局拖泥带水,个人认为到女主发现鸟死了为止就收尾最好。我还蛮喜欢这套的,我就很讨厌当代网络社交体系与现状的(我偏激。

  • 姬雪峰 8小时前 :

    偷窥者反被偷窥,然后惨遭报复。能得到的一个教训就是不要觊觎别人的生活。

  • 博辰 9小时前 :

    当你凝视深渊的时候,深渊也在凝视你:刚乔迁新居的热恋情侣在因为好奇心从无意中偷窥邻居夫妇赤膊上阵、盘肠大战,到一步步陷入肉体、快感和诱惑的欲海沉沦,在偷窥与被偷窥中,一张张高清照片让个人隐私荡然无存,甚至引来了死神的光顾;然而螳螂捕蝉,黄雀在后,善恶到头终有报,玩弄人心的衣冠禽兽也必将受到受害者绝望的反戈一击。被荷尔蒙操纵的痴男怨女们,永远理不清肉欲和爱情的先来后到。

  • 8小时前 :

    1DIY自制露天电影院看狗血家庭剧真人秀,不过票价真很昂贵。2为了保持一段关系的长久,为了粉饰这段关系温馨和谐的表象而长期忽视自己的内心需求,压抑欲望,久而久之对人产生的负面影响是很大的,一旦生活中出现诱惑,就会比常人更容易走火入魔理智崩溃无法自拔。3精神空虚能量过剩的人什么都做得出来。4女主演长得好看,但演得很浮夸,也许是导演关系,在“白莲花度假村”里她就比较正常。被偷窥的那对俊男靓女也是,模特颜值路人演技。5偷窥梗很老,也没玩出任何不同的感觉,结局又还是崩坏的,所以两星不能更多。

  • 喻芸茗 6小时前 :

    好奇害死猫的佩奇最后反杀,只是弄瞎了他们是不是太便宜了他们啦

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved