Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
镜子与皮影戏的使用很亮眼，配乐与环境音总能出乎意料，尤其是和糖果人一同出现的蜜蜂与蜂鸣，视听效果非常不错。但整体还是隔靴搔痒，表达与恐怖两不靠。
one star for silly art talk
ZZ意味过于明显，完全掩盖了恐怖氛围，挺无聊的就。要是只是想表达立场可以直接拍宣传片，别糟蹋恐怖片题材
披着恐怖外衣的zzzq电影，就四个字，没劲透了
被影院预告吸引，但种族复仇情绪太浓烈，更喜欢92版
哈哈哈哈哈让人脚趾抠地的chick flick，但是2022年还有人拍让人脚趾抠地的chick flick真好
20年前，当我上小学的时候，偶然看到了洛佩兹Love Don't Cost A Thing的MV，简直点燃我整个夏天，可如今我变了她也变了，可这电影的套路没变，太老套了吧！
没有甜甜的爱
没看过之前的版本，单就这个新版来看，画面和惊悚感做的还是可以的，只是有些场景莫名其妙，例如5个女孩洗手间对着镜子没来由的念5遍糖果人狗带的情节就挺割裂的，虽然其中一个女生是看过画展的。本片主要还是因为种族隔离和歧视的内外原因导致的怨念难消，一代代的持续至今，美国依然存在种族问题，也是这个系列可以持续拍下去的原因吧。
影片的第一个场景用剪影的方式，不仅重现了2020年5月25日，美国黑人乔治·弗洛伊德在白人警察暴力执法后死亡的事件，也奠定下了影片的整体基调——黑人种族议题。
Sure. Who doesn't like fairy tales?
因为种族歧视而凝聚的愤怒，一起汇成了糖果人。
10年后，再次和一个女孩看电影。木讷地不知道做啥，居然真的在看电影。
哈哈哈哈哈让人脚趾抠地的chick flick，但是2022年还有人拍让人脚趾抠地的chick flick真好
Marry me 很好听。大陆很少引进资本主义国家的爱情片，生活喜剧片。因为太腐败。洗脑多少年轻人。但依然阻挡不了年轻人对美剧的热爱
这是老版的续集吧，种族问题与旧日创伤，新人女导演在镜头呈现上有一种别样的特点，开篇的颠倒镜头以及全片无处不在的对镜面的利用。几处糖果人利用镜面杀人的效果加分很多，那个从厕所隔间内缓慢推到掉落在地的化妆镜镜面呈现杀人场景的镜头好绝，舞台布景的霓虹配色也是亮眼，结尾略密恐
整部影片过去了三分之一，“恐怖”才现身，快睡着了好吗？
7分，虽然剧情有些过于天真，但凯特和查理彼此了解的过程还是挺有意思，里面的歌也都挺不错。虽然彼此的生活有着天壤之别，但也正是因为这样的差异让凯特能从中体会普通人生活的淳朴，也让查理能从中放开自己的拘束。凯特说的话还是很有道理，如果我们总是回头留念，很容易重蹈覆辙，做出完全不同的决定虽然看似疯狂，但说不定能走出一条更有希望的路。
故事承接1992年老版《糖果人》，有一些看过老版的观众才能理解的段落。影片是传统的砍杀电影，主打暴力和血浆。虽然导演想要融入黑人被不公对待的社会批判元素，但技法没有老版的纯熟，显得刻意。男主角的遭遇和转变交代得模糊不清。本片最主要的突破是交代了“糖果人”其实是一个团队，是被白人虐杀或冤杀的黑人的怨灵组成的。整体较为一般。
2个小时 爆米花热血爱情电影还挺认真的 剧情 等等等等 好莱坞真是想象不到的有钱啊
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
