Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
像杀人回忆，罪案只是幌子，真正揭开的是时代的那道疤，最后那段独舞，仿佛一百年那么遥远，可望不可及的美
近树浓抹，远山轻描，中国水墨讲究的这个。所以呢，好像是描述了现实中的一起连环悬疑剧，其实写的是曾经一段不被人重视的历史，这就是现代中国经济发展的另外一面。还有另一角度就是现实很重，理想很远。舞蹈是理想，但谋生是现实，因为现实所以放弃舞蹈而去打工，最后呢现实一地鸡毛，理想更遥不可及。也许早知道结局，那不如安于理想，一辈子就只为跳舞而生。（其实就是罪案版的《站台》）
远山淡影，画面唯美；人艰不拆，道具乱入。加一星给选角的——穿便服的，都帅帅的；戴盖帽的，都胖胖的。
剧情有点老套，好像港片里有无数这样的片子，如果不是看了第一部，也不会去看第二部。
两女生感情前期铺垫不够导致动机立场不合理
画风和节奏能够延续甚至超越第一部，非常棒！难得的续集佳作。 第一部是吃猪粪，第二部是挖眼睛，两部都设置了别具一格的残忍杀人手段。 第二部结合时代背景在帮派火拼上少了很多篇幅，更聚焦描写上林组的残忍和警察的阴暗，跟第一部相比各有亮点。 记者的转变有点突兀无法理解。 最后复仇设计以眼还眼非常爽！
我要是幸太的话 有一个这么好的姐姐 还为啥要冒险过非人的生活
“日冈身上没有大上背负一切的孤独，前作是英雄悲剧这部画虎不成反类犬，所有角色都单细胞，与《极恶非道》一样令我不喜欢，铃木亮平演技不错算熬出头了，西野七濑奇差无比真别当演员了生挤眼泪太难为她”
一堆漏洞，逻辑差的要死还故作深沉，无病呻吟，呸！
剧情整体不太能撑起来，但黑道的恶与建制的恶都得以凸显，两者交织之中将剧情逐步推进，细究的话一些点还是不太能理顺，血腥戏不如第一步，挖眼、断手以及最后一场肉搏不如第一部洗手间武士刀那场，但最后日冈三枪击溃林上眼睛也算排遣了全程的压抑。
还可以吧。就是三个女主的脸，长得也太像了……
这部全是年轻人,一个年轻人干翻所有老人,西野的妈妈太违和了,才几岁?无论是两个孩子的妈妈还是俱乐部的妈妈,真的不行.
很不错！西野七濑一如既往是拉垮担当🤗要给村上虹郎和松坂桃李一万个赞！
这部全是年轻人,一个年轻人干翻所有老人,西野的妈妈太违和了,才几岁?无论是两个孩子的妈妈还是俱乐部的妈妈,真的不行.
为什么部分华语影像特别钟情于点一堆烟然后打大光束，是一种新的恋物癖嘛？
远山淡影，画面唯美；人艰不拆，道具乱入。加一星给选角的——穿便服的，都帅帅的；戴盖帽的，都胖胖的。
起了一个片名是石黑一雄的小说，然后一味的往《杀人回忆》的风格上靠，弄得十分的文艺，絮絮叨叨两个小时，其实故事打磨得很粗燥，逻辑上的漏洞太大了，之所以给三星是因为它居然是网大，以网大来说有这种资质就算不错了。PS：三个女演员我感觉都一个模样。
剧情完全没有逻辑，人物动机也不对，简直就是全员弱智
画风和节奏能够延续甚至超越第一部，非常棒！难得的续集佳作。 第一部是吃猪粪，第二部是挖眼睛，两部都设置了别具一格的残忍杀人手段。 第二部结合时代背景在帮派火拼上少了很多篇幅，更聚焦描写上林组的残忍和警察的阴暗，跟第一部相比各有亮点。 记者的转变有点突兀无法理解。 最后复仇设计以眼还眼非常爽！
桃李造型演技🉑️，剧情不太🉑️，乱，作为第二部交代的很不清楚
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
