Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
拳拳到肉的爽片，从越南打到韩国，还有最后的公交车大战。
Ｄ/ 没想到还过得去。剧作内核里的所谓“解放”逻辑是和《黑寡妇》一样想当然的，但是实现的过程相比之下丰富很多。也正是因此两个世界之间确实产生了些许美妙的联结。但总体而言还是太过于常规的“glitch-修复”套路，并非glitch艺术。以及，这种降智资本家形象越来越多也真的是只能让关于自由的想象越来越匮乏。
本质还是迪宝宝打着反资本的旗号在那耀武扬威，当然有朱迪•科默看还是一本满足（院线版的翻译非常值得吐槽，实在是给自己加戏太多了）
唤醒记忆的一吻特效太美了，树状图也能如此浪漫
Don’t have a good day. Have a great day! 看到Boston真是泪流满面
终于有人拍出理工男的浪漫了！ 我的程序设置就是这样 表白的瞬间我竟然感动到掉了泪 天呐
即使人性情感复苏的几率渺小，循规蹈矩的智能科技依旧能意识觉醒，突破因袭陈规，尝试新鲜自我。起来，不愿做奴隶的人们。这是场底层翻身做主的政治斗争，也是被剥削受压迫群体掀起的阶级革命。
没想到迄今为止将“存在先于本质”讲得最好的电影居然是一部爆米花。第九艺术的确是面向未来的表达方式，哪怕这次它还是用电影表现。
当现代电子游戏不断谦虚学习并成功实现诸多伟大的电影视听技法和叙事技巧时，很遗憾看到一部电影对游戏的视觉美学理解还停留在“街机”和“半透明蓝”时代。
这是近年来我看过的商业电影中剧本最为完美的。此前很多相似题材的故事结局不免落有遗憾，楚门的世界，异次元骇客，黑客帝国。不单单是开放结局和达成bad ending的问题。这些同题材的尝试，更多像是在抛出问题而不是给出回答。相较之下，对于人工智能和虚拟世界的问题，这部失控玩家我认为是做了可贵的正面回答的尝试，算是真正站在了巨人的肩膀上。除了在立意上标新，影片整体呈现也多有可圈可点之处，搞笑玩梗不落俗套，特效镜头设计精美制作优良，两条故事主线彼此穿插节奏得当，每一个人物都塑造了较为完整的性格，尤其配角很是出彩，咖啡店员，警官，主角的好朋友，一直举手的老哥，它们在荧幕上的存在能令观众感同身受，像剧中的游戏玩家一样，代入地体会这些AI角色的鲜活生命。个人认为这部失控玩家甚至比头号玩家更优秀。
*笑得更大声*可能是今年你能在中国大银幕上看到最精彩的电影。
还是那个味道，全片亮点都在片尾马东锡暴打恶人的场景，前面全是铺垫，不像敏捷性的动作演员，马东锡全靠力量，绝对的力量压制。不过都2022年了，韩国警察不仅没枪，连把刀也没有，全靠肉体去抓凶匪- -
Don’t have a good day. Have a great day! 看到Boston真是泪流满面
你我凡人，何尝不是为塔尖上的人，提供玩乐的NPC……
《西部世界》+《楚门的世界》，NPC拯救世界。程序员的情书，是为你coding，为你debug，太浪漫了吧，我喜欢程序员。
3.5。结尾real people love非常滑坡，塑造了这么久AI的self consciousness顿时落入俗套，虽然那一刻能感受到geeker的浪漫。娱乐性是很好，版权真无敌啊！
梗密集起来，好多情节就俗套的很...通篇充斥着政治正确和刻板印象，程序员不是印度人就得是白皮肤的霍比特人...游戏高玩就得是不能自理的妈宝废柴，还得带点恶趣味...中国人一如既往地挤在逼仄阴暗的中餐厅，皮肤暗黄、形销骨立...
唤醒记忆的一吻特效太美了，树状图也能如此浪漫
《西部世界》+《楚门的世界》，NPC拯救世界。程序员的情书，是为你coding，为你debug，太浪漫了吧，我喜欢程序员。
世界是虚假的，但当下所体验的moment，一定是真实的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
