Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
就爱看女生这种勾心斗角明争暗斗的片，还是这么好看的两位女生，还是舞蹈相关，就是主体思想导演想表达什么，放弃，自由，心灵得到释放嘛。
本来想给四星 可是女主太白莲花加绿茶了 居然背后捅刀我的漂亮女二～这讨厌的性格我直接给三星😂😂导演拍的很不错
23号公寓的坏女巫 Krysten Ritter
没有人能讲完一个故事而不暴露自己的内心，好故事永远是包含了真实的故事。剧情完成度极高，高潮反转收尾气息全部给得足足的。小孩子演友谊桥段简直真诚得逼人，未经雕琢的泪水和同情能让人瞬间破防。丽特的反派可爱又无比邪恶，黑妹小小年纪已经起范，细节里笑点相当可观。以及“魔法图书馆、同伴大冒险、勇敢做自己”，just sign me up FOREVER!
有点感人 能吐槽的点太多 有这时间宁愿去看书
PG评级的儿童向恐怖片这视觉尺度也算不错了，概念也算清晰，最大亮点是Krysten Ritter的表演，就是故事上没有提供任何真正的惊喜。
可能是太早猜出女巫身份的原因味同嚼蜡。除了大漂亮很漂亮，两个小孩子浮夸演出这两个记忆点外，没更多亮点。特别是你以为分段式恐怖短片会有看点，你会发现从没有过更加让你失望的片子。多一星给了无毛猫。 另外，祖国熊家长千万别看
爱听恐怖故事的女巫，故事中再包含几个小故事，低配版本的黑暗中讲述的恐怖故事，故事有一定反转，但总体是比较积极的主角结局。
6.7/10 Ritter怎么不拐我，我愿意永远呆在那
法国的新纳粹要是这么有胆，还至于投降的那么快？片中对种族歧视的描绘还挺淋漓的，有一些笑点不错
女巫是假的，曾经也是被抓起来的小孩，利用沉睡的女巫制造药物获得魔力，最后因完美结局，女巫苏醒，两下打败假女巫，男主利用讲故事引真女巫进火坑盖起盖烧掉
Where do stars come from? Rebel’s heart. Will of steel. Eyes set true north.
如果不是恐怖片，我可以给7.5分，绝对比老美狂蟒之灾好看，有深度，有反转！
女巫题材，故事非常儿童化，也就是靠两个小演员的表演撑起整部电影。
女主选角很成功。
灯光组也需要有好评，悬疑剧的灯光太重要了，氛围感百分之八十要靠光线烘托。
这部评分低但是还可以 适合小孩子看 暗黑童话题材，小演员的演技都不错，夜光苗圃的镰刀骷髅头挺有意思，望不到尽头的图书室也挺让人向往 魔女好美..！会吃人的巫婆 虽然故事情节老套 但是没那么无聊。觉得这部电影同时也在告诉小朋友不要轻易的去否定自己，从而放弃自己的梦想爱好👌🏻
比起第一部整体有进步 故事更完整了 但是恐怖效果有点打折扣 如果真的有水怪观赏性更高 演员都不错 没有很拉 如果出3 会继续支持
尴尬的法国喜剧，导演镜头混乱，看的人恶心。
不得不说，最后还能感受到一丝丝人性的温暖。P.S.姐姐好漂亮
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
