Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
好看，一气呵成，一点不拖泥带水。从科洛佛道10号到冰血暴，一直很喜欢外柔内刚的女主。这次终于主演大女主动作片，不负所望。
玛丽·伊丽莎白·温斯特德演的还是蛮英姿飒爽的，伍迪·哈里森能够出演这个倒是角色，也就意味着他最后百分百会跳反，总而言之，这就是个女版的怒火攻心，不过从动作还是语言上，要干净许多，但令人痴迷的暴力美学和番茄酱乐趣，也相应的被减淡了不少。。。。。。
叛逆少女和绝症阿姨。东京贩卖机还卖衣服呢。日本黑道太可怕了。
看看动作挺爽！看样子应该有续集！坚持下去，下次换个地儿，日本黑帮真是拍的够够的了！特别是今年上映的某部电影！
这种“最后一舞”的设定真的太多了，没什么新鲜感了，女主其实挺讨喜的，动作戏也有亮点，可惜了，本子太平庸了。
一个小杀手不用蒙汗药然后一刀剁了，整什么放射元素又不会马上四，摆明了让人家复仇呗，关键打戏不好看
又一部标榜女性视角的、仿 John Wick 式的工业流水线作品，Netflix 对于这种题材真的是驾轻就熟，却也实在审美疲劳了 @Netflix
网飞是准备量产john wick了吗？然后再扔骰子决定往里面丢点什么元素。真 霓虹背景，血浆量加满，给了电影出乎意料的好看。不过剧本还是那个剧本，没头脑和不高兴。
亚仁打凯特那抢打哪了 我一直找也没找到伤口
欧美流行文化日渐枯竭并且在初尝到了赛博朋克与攻壳机动队的甜头之后，网飞开始慢慢的对亚洲文化进行缓慢而有节奏的“White wash”，这个主角配置和色调什么的都呈现一种很典型的大数据趋势，尝试型的烂片无可避免，以后进化式的类似作品会越来越多，不知道是好还是坏
童年的缺失使现在的凯特身上有着诸多念想，炸弹柠檬、粉丝及父母。动作片想要高分，必须还得具有高层次的文戏，而家庭已经是陈年旧辞了。
没啥比的，当个半爽片看吧，打斗啥的就那几刀扎的还行。
这位又是哪个帅姐姐我以前没见过！！！！好英俊啊！！！！
爽片就走爽片路线，（爽度也不太够，比Johnwick差远了）不要搞什么伦理教育了呀。ps他们是如何允许女主穿着鞋站在榻榻米上的？（虽然电影里的场景也不太像真实的日本），但毕竟柯南他们连冲入案发现场那一刹那都要在第一时间脱鞋的啊～～
朋克风爆棚，居酒屋那段非常cult，血浆飞溅的暴力美学，致敬杀死比尔，比她上一部猛禽小队好看
就像我一直说得，电影故事老套无所谓，认认真真的拍就行，就怕导演没事就往文艺上靠，这部片子不错。
女版john wick《火药奶昔》，《警醒》已经凉了，这又来？话说这些女星一把岁数了怎么反而开始喜欢打架了
演员卡司不行啊 达咩 抄安吉丽娜朱莉的特工绍特都没抄到精髓 抄查尔斯萨隆的极寒之地也是只有皮毛和元素的重复 完全就一烂片
平庸吧。不过温斯特德这两年在外形上倒是挺作践自己的，当年的她多可人啊~~~
剧情也就是走个过场没什么可说，动作本应是大头但总体平平，依靠一些视觉元素混搭尚能看个热闹，如果在此基础上多些爆点，也许能成一部特点鲜明的片。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
