Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
国外搞BL又不犯法，既然神奇动物拍不出什么名堂，既然卖点都在GGAD，老老实实就拿他俩当主角拍个系列不好吗？好歹剧情给我整明白咯，别硬要塞个神奇动物点题最后搞成个四不像…魔法世界选领导就这么儿戏，血盟在前作里说得很像回事儿似的结果莫名其妙就打破了，Credence也完全是工具人，那个卧底更是让人摸不着头脑…最后，剧情都拍成这样了，就不能找青年组那两位救个场让我圆个梦吗啊椰子？？？好吧全片唯一亮点互摸心跳…以及护树罗锅和麒麟还是蛮可爱的…
题材挺好就是后边处理太爽片了，导致整个高潮部分都很弱，ps真的好羡慕男主角能遇到这种老师，上学上到博士了还是没能遇到过类似的
还真敢拍啊，老师污蔑学生的学校，还能叫学校吗？
包场体验美好。当前恰恰是院线观影的黄金时光。影片超出预期。
首映一刷最大感觉是散，麒麟强设定弱逻辑，克雷登斯从第二部最大伏笔变成纯工具人，邓校的“镜空间”技能挺炫。结尾邓校驻足婚礼外一瞬侧身走开，这幕太棒了，加一星。
可以了可以了,让我对澳洲的自然风光感兴趣了. 人呐,别太自以为是,别太自我感动,少点表演,多点真诚.
合家欢电影，其乐融融。感觉人类真的很自私。
强如崔敏植，也拯救不了剧情平庸的流水线商业片。
很无聊，不知道想说什么，然后待在电影院空调很大很冷，电影的声音也很大，整个过程如坐针毡……
非常可爱的动画片，小孩子也很喜欢。无论是搞笑动作故事还是动画创作都相当满意。
这部真是小学生宫斗。。。神奇动物也没啥戏份
各种动物实在太可爱了。不过放到现实生活中，除了考拉，其他的我该害怕的还是害怕哈
可惜 这些“love”的人不对 德普形象先入为主了 人换了“分手”看得我内心毫无波澜（没有说拔爷不好的意思就是画风不太搭）
看到最后我想问一下，邓布利多教授是不是和漫威共享了一个宇宙了，怎么打着打着也整出一个镜像世界？黑人大叔为什么说反水就反水，也没有个线索。奎妮不需要GG的政审吗，这么快就回到正义阵营？像看了一个超长版世纪决战预告片！
说它不是澳洲人拍的吧，各种元素用得是真溜…… 说它是澳洲人拍的吧，能解救cane toad也不知道是怎么想的……
粉丝滤镜下，也只能给这个分数，剧情确实有点拉胯，只能欣赏一下演技了
剧情稀烂到懒得吐槽…就真的毫无逻辑的走向…虽然觉得老麦很适合格林德沃但看了两部德普演员一下子转换不过来…觉得老麦好慈祥难以捕捉到角色感lol…神奇动物系列强行塞进很多异国（东方）元素 但是观众对于魔法世界还是一头雾水…
土澳版神奇动物🐍🕷🦂🦎🐊🦈 虽然自己也一直对危险且冷血的动物有很大偏见，看完这部，突然发现人类才是危险系数最高的动物，它们一出生就远离栖息地，城市动物园里无亲无故，还要遭受非议，说实话 他们不欠人类的，人与自然的话题也一直到今天，尊重 保护 不作秀，伸出援手，对他们的保护亦是保护人类环境。整部影片还是很喜欢动物aussie accent，最喜欢jacki阿姨和鲨鱼，可可爱爱的jacki就像是邻家阿姨，对胖胖萌萌的卡通形象没有抵抗力，maddie也又美又飒（叫maddie的都很酷姐？）有趣的是看小黄人我居然是被动的笑，这部竟如此行云流水（？）赞就一个字👍
真的比第一部好看太多了 幸好了看了评论说这一部好看 这部是真的很可！！
而不是老大叔深情搞基
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
