Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
冰冷的卧室，看着镜子里的自己，我将一辈子困囿于城堡中吗？
Just run!
看前半小时的时候就开始在灵魂拷问自己为什么要看这部片。。。暮光女这不搭的气质加导演的谜之西宫娘娘烙大饼的幻想就不说了 这整个故事的内核真的好尬好没意思
以父之名看不到 阶级斗争的故事也看不到 看到的反而是王室大部分人都理解了她 除了查尔斯格局小了 其他人都对他足够宽容 无论塞书的侍卫长还是贴身女仆 当然还有那位有容乃大的英女王
K是有多想拿奖……恳求导演离开好莱坞吧，老是用女演员+传记片，他不烦我们观众也烦了
视听不错，特别是台球桌和最后的自杀
电影里大部分时间的戴妃都是敏感而神经质的状态，让人一度觉得难以忍受，觉得和想象中的那个平民王妃差太远了。但到最后当她终于挣脱枷锁做回斯宾塞时，那个我们熟悉的戴安娜又回来了，她依然是迷人、亲切而优雅的，原来那个大城堡禁锢了她这么多迷人的特质。当公主嫁给王子，当童话故事结束后，城堡里又发生了些什么呢。
看来应该欣赏他们别的片子，比较一下。
从表演到剧作本身到拍摄都过分做作了，象征手法用的太泛滥，如稻草人、衣服、食物、扯项链、缝窗帘、剪铁丝网，楼梯、射鸟、安妮博林等，设计感过重同时又设计的并不高明，就这么堆在一起，咋的，打算以量取胜了？惊悚感立意还OK，演员选错，斯图尔特太拉胯，用力过猛，背景板里一堆会演戏的英国人也实在是带不动。同样讲皇室对戴安娜的围猎，《王冠》赢得很彻底
眼光够传神
硕大珍珠项链，却令人窒息，崩溃不已
从表演到剧作本身到拍摄都过分做作了，象征手法用的太泛滥，如稻草人、衣服、食物、扯项链、缝窗帘、剪铁丝网，楼梯、射鸟、安妮博林等，设计感过重同时又设计的并不高明，就这么堆在一起，咋的，打算以量取胜了？惊悚感立意还OK，演员选错，斯图尔特太拉胯，用力过猛，背景板里一堆会演戏的英国人也实在是带不动。同样讲皇室对戴安娜的围猎，《王冠》赢得很彻底
明明阿萨亚斯把克里斯汀·斯图尔特调教得好好的，为什么在这部片子里又成了这副鬼样子？所有纤细闪动的微表情非但没有表现出王妃的敏感痛苦的内心活动，反倒显得无比地做作、神经质。
Jackie是有机的，而Spencer像是一张粗浅的心理问卷。
很意外竟然选用了不少恐怖片才有的悬疑手法，诸如吞食珍珠、浴室镜中的幻觉、Park House楼梯下坠。Free Jazz和古典乐恰如其分的施展高压的内心，甚至刻意将女王和王子的脸都被刻画得冷漠、僵硬，这与明丽的胶片色彩反差极大。富丽堂皇中却处处出现撒谎者、叛徒、告密者，森严的传统里威尔逊王妃和被猎杀的雉鸡没有差别。出逃后，在泰晤士河吃着KFC的王妃决定做回斯宾塞，眺望着曾今被亨利八世囚禁Anne Boleyn的伦敦塔时，她将自己定义为Diana, the shock。
威尼斯主竞赛第五场，欲戴王冠必承其重👑。她只想做回斯宾塞小姐，而不是当威尔士王妃。斯图尔特演的很棒远超我的预期。我最想知道的是那件高定Chanel礼服的花费👗。
对于斯图尔特的表演评价真是两极分化。不过传记片里，演得是否“像”也不是评判是否演得好的唯一标准。以及戴安娜斯宾塞原本就是一个离大众极远的人，大众说了也不算（这部片子已经把这个距离尽量缩短了）。导演适合拍恐怖片。（一查果然拍了一部金）
演技着急，服装加一星。矫情如我，都觉得spencer过于矫情了，服化道真的好看
因为是根据真实悲剧改编，再现了戴安娜与英国皇室决裂的那个“圣诞节”期间的故事，也还是吸引人的。女主获得即将揭晓的本届奥斯卡金像奖最佳女演员提名。导演是智利出生，拍过不少历史人物电影。对历史题材有兴趣的观众可看。
吊打一众网大，但是珠玉在前，不过比保镖好，整体好看，4.5，多的是情怀分，彩蛋好幸福！！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
