A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
总之，好好的故事，强行用人命牺牲拔高立意，不行。
孩子们一声声的老师也太窝心了，老师舍不得孩子们又回来那一幕挺感动的
老师太难了，一方面是需要帮助的孩子们，一方面又是母亲病危，真的很佩服他。
剧情感人，时间跨度大，节奏不拖沓；部分细节因过于文艺而导致失真；这样的支教真的令人钦佩。
真没想到僧格会死，有种自己从小看到大的孩子出事的心痛感，唉真是不知道明天和意外哪个先来
遗憾的是，韩老师和女主最后也没有一个孩子，如果有一个属于自己的孩子，他们应该会更幸福吧
在中国肯定还有很多个像韩松老师一样，不怕艰苦，终生扎根在边疆支教，他们无私奉献的精神必将会影响一代又一代的人。
由男主一个人将孩子们从小培养到高中也是有点儿不容易了吧，关键是从头到尾我都没看见过书本...
我会间或疑问，人这一生为了什么？
藏区支教题材，很是推荐
无法理解这种无私的爱，可能是细节铺垫不够所以说服不了我吧，但是演技是不错的。
男主那演技真的是绝了，特别是母亲病重那段，哭的那叫一个撕心裂肺啊
讲述老师到偏远地区支教的故事，联想到不丹电影《教室里的一头牦牛》和中国电影《蓝学校》。
看到孩子们的处境真的心酸，不过看到他们那种蓬勃的生命力，以及对知识的渴望还是很受鼓舞。
环游世界与永葆青春与长命百岁
感情线如果能再“虐”点就好了，男女主一直朋友相待最后搞个意难平什么的，也能弥补感情戏的空虚
看不得乖巧的孩子们受苦，越懂事越心疼，实在是很能理解男主为什么会那么舍不得想帮助孩子们
四星给到导演，五星给到故事，故事很简单，但直击人心，因为真实，因为纯粹，干干净净，就像洁白的哈达
很久没有看过这么平和的片子了。全片看完就只有舒服和自在，是一部非常不错的电影。故事很简单，女主的那种天生的气质是最出彩的。
韩松老师上课好有趣，尤其是模仿外国人买包子的场景，笑死我了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
