A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
算是合格的爆米花大片，韩版的《加勒比海盗》，脸谱化的人物设定，插科打诨，精彩的打斗，宏大场面，养眼美女，甜蜜爱情，大团圆结局。不用管结局是否合理，观影过程还是蛮开心的。
还有船上的另一女的，平时那弓箭手不咋滴她，结果后来船遇到事故了，这个着急。
热闹程度与上一部大体一致，但趣味性差了许多，男主颜值也不好。整体比较一般。
演员都努力的，但单薄的剧情下角色越努力就越尴尬，剧情节奏很迷，有时候看着看着有种谁拨动了我进度条的突兀展开。笑点陈旧，感情线更是听天由命，看着看着就会开始疑惑，这片拍摄的时候难道导演不在现场吗？
只能说近几年韩国的商业片越来越多。李演员的演技还是可以的，但还是希望他可以演一些严肃的角色，更能凸显演技。
学了一点点《双旗镇刀客》之皮毛，故事太弱智，情节相当搞笑。另外，女主忒寒碜了。
继寿喜锅西部片之后，亚洲电影又诞生了泡菜坛海盗片。NF插足后，明显感觉叙事节奏快很多，甚至已经不是快了，前半部分仿佛短视频拼接的，太过跳跃性。权相宇演的反派也毫无存在感，剧情上仿佛是刻意安排的，缺少1里面对反派的情节刻画，好在他打的不错，刀招耍的很漂亮，扳回一城。这个续作如果能继续保持第一部的叙事节奏与剧本质量，以2的预算应该算是佳片了。PS，配乐太过奇怪了，各种混搭，那个迪斯科风的魔性音乐仿佛是制作团队拿到大额预算后high上天的产物，总是在展现一股子莫名的亢奋
除了企鹅有点假之外，其他特效中规中矩。剧情和恋爱线都很一般。最后，韩孝周这个女人为什么这么好看啊！PS：请韩国的导演们加加油，把全韩国的王牌女演员们拉来把这个系列做成像加勒比海盗那样的，那么就算剧情拉胯我也会吹一波颜值的。
质感真好，剧情太简单，招式是亮点，非常致命，最后那个西洋刀加手甲太赖了，那家伙练了10年也就那么回事
…………吃力不讨好的一个电影，各位演员都极尽卖力，编导也努力试图让剧情挠笑观众了，后期特效也很大片感，大屏幕看一定会更好些，但无奈戏份分配略缺重点，就算拍成韩版加勒比也不过是个二手，再一看，网飞，难怪满屏西方俗套味。可惜了放下斯文公子形像的姜河那，他造型和表演路线本次倒是挺出人意表的，但无奈角色也没有太多新意。我是真没笑过，这片子拍得比较闹腾。～
这...不就是一部网大，前一部讲中国和朝鲜，这部讲日本和朝鲜。有啥冒险的内容？
片子有些地方很像《绣春刀》，可能是致敬吧！《绣春刀》描绘的是大明王朝大庙高堂上的尔虞我诈，此片则是讲述了大明王朝边塞小镇的江湖恩怨。一句话，我喜欢，是现如今妖魔鬼怪当道的影视圈的良心、诚意之作！
很用心的一部电影。近几年这类的影片真的很少了。
3、台词上韩国本土的梗很多，恐怕翻译过来也不太能100%传递。
不知道这片怎么打到不及格的。韩孝周你们不动心。而且在海上漂泊那么久还那么光鲜，特别是甩头发
这部电影虽然写的故事背景在西北大漠。然而，却勾起我一个江南人的回忆。
有的情节太繁杂看得很费劲 感觉能砍半小时精简一下
韩孝周的颜+李光洙的浮夸=一部无脑欢乐情侣下饭剧
动作戏很棒啊，看悍刀行看瞎了眼，很需要这种动作戏洗洗眼睛；意境也不错啊；然而我最想知道的，这个男主难道不是张震么？盲开的这部网大，一看男主我就去搜了下，有点小激动，然而张震没演这个... 我还以为墨镜王带着张震混网大了呢....
看完有两个疑问：一是韩孝周怎么这么好看，二是她怎么会在这么个电影里面。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
