Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
故事简单完整但剧情欠饱满，前因不清后果不明，算是开放性结局，作为一部喜剧动漫，制作可以达到三星的水准。里面有一个point我很喜欢，就是史蒂夫打拳击的时候，温妮总对他说的那句，要跟随你自己的步调。套用在现实世界也是如此，不要被强者的步调牵着走，只跟随你自己的步调，哪怕赢不了，混过三回合也是一种胜利。
就是说 剧情单一没起伏 结尾做的很潦草
不会有任何人光睡觉就能变成金腰带，苏乞儿梦里也要练睡梦罗汉拳，所以这根本不类似任何拳击励志电影；
没有想象力 没有创新 全是套路，只能给小孩看，相信我，稍微成年一点的会无聊到睡着了
这俩小犄角 真是黄鼠狼下耗子 派拉蒙还得加把劲儿
看片名还以为有奇思妙想呢，结果连怪兽迷小孩都看不下去
男生应该很喜欢这类的电影，单从我自己的角度来讲有点血腥，我有点看不懂，只是我自己的看法哈
结局结束得太突然，我以为怎么着他们的父亲会再次出现，就这么为剧情服务莫名其妙地失踪了？
非常八点档）虽然美女们都还挺美的 不建议认真观看 白痴恋爱脑听个响还是可以的
还行吧，中规中矩，爆米花电影，唯一的亮点就是跳舞和甩摔跤结合起来，剧情很老套，动物设计就丑怪丑怪的
这几年的动画片剧情都好老套 萌点也越来越劣质
他爸呢？怪兽爸呢？火鸡为什么放他回来比赛？人物成长有弧度吗？最后变成怪兽斗舞了？PS怪物好丑
质感好差……而且细节不抠的话就完全没有设定本身带来的有趣感了。怪兽如何和人类一起生活？睡竞技场吗？人类每次看到摔跤难道不都会死一大片吗？人设老套拿世界观来凑啊。
就完全是乏善可陈，故事没有新意，人物没有特色，再美好的内核也包不住啊。
平庸、俗套，如同嚼蜡。《奎迪》的动画版，剧情毫无悬念，少有的动画电影能看得打瞌睡的。比赛前的音乐模仿《洛奇》的《Eye of the tiger》。
剧情跳得也太快了，不励志也不热血，更不搞笑，算是儿童片
我们看过很多版本的人类训练机甲、机器人搏斗的电影，这个是“舞林争霸”版！
浪漫爱情轻喜剧，看着还是挺轻松养眼的 20220430
看的心里极不舒服，虽然是根据纳粹的残暴史，本该愤怒，但看心里堵的慌。
怪兽训练营.Monster.on.the.Hill.2021.HD1080P.X264.AAC.Mandarin.CHS.mp4
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
