Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
先一步看了... 不剧透地说电影很煽情，邻座人哭得稀里哗啦。女角们都又酷又美！
吴京的血肉横飞，章子怡的饱含情怀，徐峥的经商之道，最喜感的还是沈腾。说不上哪个最好，各有千秋，春兰秋菊。6.6
别整这六十岁老男审美了行吗？这老少配对手戏还看得下去？007会变老但007旁边的美女却永远不会？
章子怡那段女儿继承父母航天事业，成为宇航员特别出彩
继第一部《我和我的祖国》、第一部《我和我的家乡》的第三部——《我和我的父辈》，总的来说还是不错的，这一系列得都很喜欢。“乘风”这段骑兵团气势恢宏，大场面很壮观，没想到居然是儿子牺牲了，吴京中的那一枪居然毫无阻碍到他继续斗争下去也是厉害的，不过这一段确实也很有意义。章子怡那part最触动我，最惊喜的，故事完整，泪点直接登顶。第一次当导演真的很不错了。徐峥利用中国第一支广告的诞生这part告知人们敢为人先的精神来感染后代。沈腾那part我其实一直都很期待的，喜欢他一如既往的沈腾式搞笑，后面很感动。
吴京和章子怡导演的篇章特别好看，沈腾延续了一贯的搞笑风格，麻花团队就是牛！
前两个比较沉重，后面的比较欢快，个人比较喜欢前两个，尤其是吴京那个，整体三星半吧，应该会爆。
个人观感：《我和我的祖国》＞《我和我的家乡》≈《我和我的父辈》。—— 章子怡《诗》＞吴京《乘风》≈ 徐峥《鸭先知》＞沈腾《少年行》：还以为这是沈腾第一次当导演拍的影视作品？原来他导过一部叫《人见人爱》的剧。——《我和我的祖国》徐峥《夺冠》＞《我和我的家乡》徐峥《最后一课》＞《我和我的父辈》徐峥《鸭先知》。
诗 > 鸭先知 > 乘风 = 及格线 > 少年行，有惊喜也有不足，整体还是达到预期了。章子怡拍的部分共情力很强，诗作为连接逝者与生者的桥梁，所承载的意义可以很深远。徐峥拍的部分视觉风格确实很有借鉴原作的感觉，观感上也很舒适，用略带夸张的方式展示勇于探索创新的第一代人。吴京拍的部分属实是太平常的抗战片了，也不是不好，但整个故事太扁平直白化。沈腾拍的部分就真的是大杂烩下的灾难，许多元素汇在一起，却没有一个元素突出为亮点，庸俗而冗杂。
抱着建国大业的期望值来 给了我惊喜 章子怡那段太好了
在这部丹尼尔克雷格版007谢幕之作中感情戏的份量显然大于动作戏，看完之后会留下印记的是邦德和玛德琳之间的羁绊而非邦德和又一个不知道哪里冒出来的看似无敌实则拉胯的新反派之间的对决。邦德初见女儿的反应也比例行公事般的飞车爆炸有意思。一直为国奋战的007最后选择为了家人而牺牲，也算是给了丹尼尔克雷格版007一个比较好的收尾。
喜欢诗和鸭先知。
这个系列真就是几个导演pk现场，这届轮到演员转型的导演了。 合家欢最服沈腾，果然也是最好笑的；小人物果然徐峥，弄堂里的事，说的简单不浅薄，像一篇老作文，弘扬真善美那种；中国力量最服吴京，果然厉害，也最催泪，中国父子复杂又特殊的亲密也有代入感，美中不足看不出是抗日战争，所有的演员都是过得太好了的现代感，即使已经努力把脸抹黑了；章子怡，好好做演员吧，哪天想明白到底要表达什么，拥有了导演思维，再说吧。
Daniel Craig谢幕演出，虽是最丑邦德也是成功代表…Lea和新手特工Ana都太美，整部剧颜值担当…反派safin好丑，面瘫脸…动作调情拯救世界是永远的主题…虽然没搞懂神奇的DNA纳米机器人…
两次重逢，乘风以及时光机器人，让人感动
看了点映，超过预期！最大惊喜就是章子怡《诗》，把浪漫的氛围刻画的含蓄但非常饱满，航天就是一个浪漫的职业，先人不遗余力的探索才有如今中国航天的强大！感动
好歹是谢幕战，文戏又臭又长就算了，动作场面也是难看的没边，怀念皇家赌场时意气风发憋着一口气想要证明自己的邦德~6.5
先一步看了... 不剧透地说电影很煽情，邻座人哭得稀里哗啦。女角们都又酷又美！
挫折与悲伤
Ana太惊艳了，有当年Eva出场时的感觉，依然是制作精良，动作场面很大，摄影很好，剧本普通，这次告别了，为邦德的谢幕加一星，to James Bond
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
